In this paper we outline the (stated) philosophy governing the EU policy proposals regarding Education and Training (ET) systems. We review the various criticism that are addressed by the experts to ET systems as they are currently organised : in an age where knowledge and skills are of primary importance to maintain both individual and national competitivness, ET systems ignore the requirements of competitivness, partly because they are too heavily institutionalized (making therefore individuals less responsible), because they rely too much on formal accreditations and develop an elitist structure that drives the entire system away from market needs. The EU experts tend therefore to promote a new system more responsive to market needs, inter alia through the diffusion of information and transparency, the recognition of informal ways of learning, and a curricular content stressing much more methods (problemsolving abilities, information processing abilities….) than contents. The widespread use of ICT would play here a crucial role. The adaptiveness of ET systems could also be fostered by systematic evaluation and decentralization, while States, firms and individuals should increase their investement in human resources and capital. This lato sensu vocationalisation of ET systems would help in promoting social cohesion and a new sense of active citizenship. We review a series of criticism that could be levelled against such a policy agenda, which exaggerates the responsibiliy of the supply-side (the reform of ET systems would alone solve all of the problems) while downplaying the crucial importance of the demand side (the firms using the products of ET systems), and which probably overstates the benefits of a narrowly vocational ET system. The ideological preconceptions of the experts led them to exaggerate the ability of individuals to build their own curricula, and to neglect the role of teachers in education. Last but not least, they ignore the dangers linked with the introduction of shorttermism and commercial concerns in a world which was initially devised to prepare for the long run adaptiveness of society and individuals, not solely from an economic point of view, but also social, moral and political.