Re-visiting the NVQ Debate: ‘Bad’ Qualifications, Expansive Learning Environments and Prospects for Upskilling Workers

NVQs have endured nearly two decades of criticism on philosophic and practical grounds. This paper uses qualitative evidence to report the impact of this qualification for groups of lower grade staff working in the healthcare sector and finds beneficial effects on acquisition of knowledge and skills, personal attributes and pay and career progression. It analyses the reasons for the apparent success of the qualification and argues that this lies in specific features of the workplaces concerned which were partly fulfilling criteria for an ‘expansive’ orientation to workforce development. These included provision of multiple sources of organisational support for learners, careful design and quality monitoring of associated learning interventions and alignment of development for individual and organisational goals leading to opportunities for career progression. This consequently led to higher than usual exposure to learning interventions for NVQ participants and more reported ‘learning’ taking place. It concludes by considering the prospects for the NVQ, what we can learn from these settings about effective skills development strategies and the prospects for replication of these outcomes in the wider economy.

File Downloads

Latest SKOPE Publications

  • SKOPE brochure

    Published 5th December 2025

  • Degrees of Difference: International Higher Education and Social Mobility

    Published 12th November 2025

  • From Competition to Coordination: Rethinking Post-16 Education and Training in the UK

    Published 15th April 2025